September 10, 2010
The Problem with a "Moral Obligation" in Government and Economics
Excuse me, but don't we have a personal obligation (and a moral one) to be responsible for ourselves?
Additionally, if people are so dependent upon Social Security and Medicare today, then how have these programs been successful?
What Howard Dean seems to keep out of the "moral obligation" card is cost. Is it worth bankrupting the country to provide everyone with health care (essentially a bankruptcy would not lead to health care for all)?
Liberals needs to pick up a book and study economics as a system, to the heart of which is scarcity. If you try to ignore scarcity, you will either create inventory and/or price distortions. Anyone who looks at the CBO's projections can tell that we've taken scarcity out of the retirement and healthcare services sectors for baby boomer retirees and thrown it square on the backs of the taxpayers. When will we ever learn?
Popular This Month
TRUE PROGRESSIVISM: A LESSON FROM TEDDY ROOSEVELT I've noticed in the health care debate that liberals are constantly digging up Te...
Milton Friedman discusses the problem with government support of companies through subsidies. Think about the consumer and choice. Do they...
DISCLAIMER: Before anyone reads this article, I want to make it crystal clear that I am not defending the current actions of the Federa...
“In the age of financial regulation reform, everyone forgets that the last time we had financial regulatory reform, it l...