May 23, 2012
Could the JP Morgan Chase Situation Get Worse? Should Dimon Resign?
1) According to CNBC, the unit responsible for the $2 billion plus loss has a roughly $100 billion exposure to asset backed securities and other types of complex, illiquid securities. Why did JPM allow such a large composition of assets to be allocated to this risk?
2) Would the complexity of financial reform/regulation have helped or hurt in this situation? I'm left to ponder why 2,300 pages of Dodd-Frank, a new Consumer Protection Bureau, and a Securities and Exchange Commission could not prevent such a problem. (Note: See the second video for more on this).
3) Will Jamie Dimon lose his job as a result of this? In my opinion, it depends on a) if the firm followed (or follows) all disclosure and accounting rules, b) if the loss gets much worse (like $10 billion), and c) if Dimon or his subordinates are found liable in some way by regulators/authorities.
Tomorrow, I will address the Volcker Rule and how it would not necessarily represent the cure to some of our financial ills.
Popular This Month
TRUE PROGRESSIVISM: A LESSON FROM TEDDY ROOSEVELT I've noticed in the health care debate that liberals are constantly digging up Te...
Milton Friedman discusses the problem with government support of companies through subsidies. Think about the consumer and choice. Do they...
DISCLAIMER: Before anyone reads this article, I want to make it crystal clear that I am not defending the current actions of the Federa...
“In the age of financial regulation reform, everyone forgets that the last time we had financial regulatory reform, it l...